Sari Botton

A Conversation with Sari Botton

There are a few women on my radar who are spearheading a reinvention of the way we talk about personal narrative and memoir—and Sari Botton is one of them. She is a seasoned editor and the author of the memoir And You May Find Yourself... Confessions of a Late-Blooming Gen-X Weirdo.

In our conversation below, we discuss everything from the ethics of memoir and how to navigate writing about other people to how different editors define what an essay is. She raises some revolutionary points about owning our stories and the kind of language we permit ourselves to use in describing them.


 

SARI BOTTON is the author of the memoir-in-essays, And You May Find Yourself...Confessions of a Late-Blooming Gen-X Weirdo. She is a contributing editor and columnist at Catapult, the former Essays Editor for Longreads, and a former columnist for the Rumpus, where she interviewed established and new writers from Cheryl Strayed to Samantha Irby.

Sari edited the New York Times-bestselling Goodbye to All That: Writers on Loving and Leaving New York and Never Can Say Goodbye: Writers on Their Unshakable Love for New York. Her work has appeared in the New York TimesNew York Magazine, the Village VoiceHarper's BazaarMarie ClaireMore, and the Rumpus.

In addition to teaching creative nonfiction at Bay Path University and Catapult, Sari is the publisher and editor of three Substack publications: Oldster MagazineAdventures in Journalism, and Memoir Monday

 

KARIN GUTMAN: You’ve written about how you’ve navigated writing about other people, as well as interviewing authors about this thorny topic in your Rumpus column Conversations with Writers Braver Than Me.
 
How did you handle this issue with your memoir And You May Find Yourself?

 
SARI BOTTON: When it came time to actually write my book, I realized I needed to first write a vomit draft, what I call a ‘warts and all’ vomit draft with everything in it. All the bad stuff. And then once it was out of my body, out of my head on the page, only then could I blur, subtract and edit.
 
I did it. I handed in the book. That book was edited.
 
And then I went back to my editor, and I said, You know what? I have to do that again. I’ve got to do another level of extraction. I said, I'm not going to get to publish my book in 2021. It's going to be 2022. And she said, Fine. So, I went back and scrubbed it of any unnecessary, inflammatory details. I further blurred people. 
 
KARIN:  Do you feel like these changes diluted the story at all?
 
SARI:  It's still to me all true. I changed so many identifying characteristics. I really did my best to make it so that if one of these awful people who I dated read it, they'd know it was them but nobody else would know unless they already knew the story. I tended to only change your name if you were a jerk. I showed the people I care about the pieces they were in, and said, Is this okay with you? How do you want me to refer to you? Do you want me to change your name?
 
KARIN:  The ethics of memoir are deeply personal. Given how challenging these lines are for you, did you ever consider fictionalizing your story?
 
SARI:  You should write fiction because you're interested in fiction and the art and mechanics of it, not because you're trying to avoid getting in trouble for writing about your life. People will see right through that. I have an idea for a novel and a list of ideas for short stories. But I want to do those things because I want to play God with characters who do interesting things, not because I want to write a story about my relationship with people in my life in a way that they will not recognize themselves, because that's impossible.
 
KARIN:  What about a pseudonym?
 
SARI:  I created a pseudonym for myself. She has a Gmail and a Twitter account. There were a few reasons I didn't publish under that name. One is that I would be really pissed off; I have spent more than 30 years building my platform. For me to then have to hide behind a pseudonym and build that pseudonym’s platform… I wasn't up for that. There’s just something about needing to own my personal story.
 
KARIN:  Can you give an example of how you handled some of the more incendiary material?
 
SARI:  There's a piece in the book about my struggle with body image and weight and eating disorders. In the ‘warts and all’ vomit draft version, a relative makes a comment on my butt when I'm seven, and it completely traumatizes me.
 
I revised that chapter to say that “the adults around me” were really to blame. I realized that my babysitters were on diets. My teachers were on diets and made comments about their bodies and other kids’ bodies. My aunts, my uncles. My grandparents were on the Pritikin Diet, and we all knew about it. It really was the culture. 
 
So, I pulled back on my book to the point where I could make the stories, especially the most difficult ones, about cultural phenomena. Yeah, that relative was a big part of it, but it wasn't necessary for this particular story.
 
KARIN:  In the introduction you write that the purpose of this book is to say simply, “I was here, I lived.” I found that refreshing.
 
You also refer to the series of essays as “confessional” which I find can be used to describe memoir in a derogatory way. What does that word mean to you?
 
SARI:  A lot of the rules of memoir, and of all writing, were written by straight white men.
 
I just read one of Annie Ernaux’s books, and it was 60 pages. She calls herself an “Ethnographer of the Self.” I love that she won the Nobel Prize for that work, and I am all for ethnography of the self.
 
I think we need to be rewriting all the rules of all writing, including memoir and essays. I reject the idea that you can't be a victim. Roxane Gay has written about this in her memoir, Hunger: “It took a long time, but I prefer 'victim' to 'survivor' now. I don't want to diminish the gravity of what happened. I don't want to pretend I'm on some triumphant, uplifting journey. I don't want to pretend that everything is okay. I'm living with what happened, moving forward without forgetting, moving forward without pretending I am unscarred.”
 
I just had an argument the other day with a writer whom I love. She says, “There are no victims in essay and memoir.” I was like, “Yeah, we're rewriting those rules. I mean, there are victims.” 
 
I was in a writing group with some people and I stopped being in the writing group, because I wrote a story about something that happened to me when I was seven. And someone said, “You sound like a victim.” And then someone else was like, “Yeah, you don't want to sound like a victim.” I said, “I was seven. I was a victim.” Bullies have made all the rules. Bullies don't want to read victimization stories, but other victims do. 
 
When I was at Longreads, I wrote a blog post about how Elizabeth Wurtzel made it okay to write ‘Ouch’. I feel very strongly that when you've been hurt, it's okay to write ‘Ouch’. I hate false bravado.
 
I also like confessions. The reason I chose to call these confessions instead of essays is because some of the pieces in the book don't really rise to the standards of an essay collection. This is a memoir in episodes, in vignettes. I'm confessing to things that I haven't been allowed to say, that I've wanted to say, that aren't all flattering. And so, I call them confessions.
 
KARIN: You have devoted your career to personal narrative, both as a writer and as an editor.
 
SARI:  It's absolutely true. I've been involved in this since 1991.
 
KARIN:  You’ve been witness to the whole trajectory since the memoir boom of the 90s. Where do you think things are headed? 
 
SARI:  Early on, there was Prozac Nation. There was The Liar's Club. There was Angela's Ashes. There was The Kiss, Kathryn Harrison's memoir about her affair with her father. That was the beginning of the 90s memoir boom. 
 
It's been a boom bust, boom bust kind of thing.
 
Where it's headed is more previously marginalized voices are being shared. I've noticed a lot of memoirs that are written in fragments. Maggie Smith has one coming out. She's a poet. Abigail Thomas writes in fragments. It feels like she's always been writing in fragments from her first memoir, Safekeeping.
 
I tend to think unless your memoir is about a very specific turn of events, a straight narrative can be really boring because the connective tissue in between the important points in your life can make it blah.
 
I'm just finishing this memoir, which I absolutely love by Kimberly Harrington, But You Seemed So Happy. It's about the dissolution of her marriage. She alternates personal essays with humor essays, like she would have in McSweeney's or Shouts and Murmurs in the New Yorker. It's all about her marriage, but it's broken up. I've been more drawn toward episodic memoirs.
 
KARIN:  More like a memoir-in-essays?
 
SARI:  Yes. The ‘essay’ term is very broad. I have a larger understanding of what a personal essay is, but there are people who are sticklers.
 
KARIN:  What does it mean to fit the standards of an essay?
 
SARI:  I've worked with colleagues who feel very strongly that a personal essay needs to have a real argument in it.
 
KARIN:  What does that mean exactly?
 
SARI:  You're making a point with the essay, you're not just telling a story. I like to let the reader figure out what the point is. A lot of publications require an essay to have at its center an argument that you then back up with data and sources, even if it's just a very personal story.
 
I wrote an op-ed for The New York Times about when I got hit by a car. I was so stunned that people in New York were so helpful to me. The editors wanted me to bring in another instance in which somebody was hit by a car and not treated the same way as me. Also, to bring in statistics. Now that's an op-ed which is a different kind of essay, but there are editors at a lot of publications that want you to do that. With a personal essay, they want you to use your anecdote to illustrate a point. By my standards, the pieces in my book are personal essays, but again, I have a much broader definition than some editors.
 
KARIN:  What about Modern Love?
 
SARI:  I think they look for the Modern Love piece to really have a point at the center of it, even if it's not spelled out. Whereas some of mine are more like light anecdotes.
 
KARIN:  But I imagine that you, as an editor of essays, would want to know Why are you telling me this?
 
SARI:  That has to be inherent, but it doesn't have to be spelled out.
 
KARIN:  What is the difference between a long-form essay and a shorter form essay? Other than the length?
 
SARI:  My second Modern Love is 1,500 or 1,600 words, but there's a 5,000-word version of it in the book. I first wrote the 5,000-word version long before I had a book deal. I struggled to sell it and then I thought, I’ll try and do a Modern Love version. I did, and I sold it.
 
Some of it has to do with where you want to publish it. A great exercise is to have different versions of your piece that can go in different places and also amplify different aspects of the same story. 
 
It's harder to publish long-form right now. There are fewer and fewer venues. These days, Longreads is primarily a curation site with occasional long-form personal essays; where I used to publish three a week, they're now publishing maybe one a month. And Catapult just folded. It's hard to publish a 5,000-word essay, unless it's in your book. So, it might be worth your while to come up with a 1,200-word version for the Washington Post or the Huffington Post—a shorter version that could maybe even help you get a book deal, and then you put the longer version in the book.
 
KARIN:  What is your advice to writers who have a story they’re feeling reluctant to tell?
 
SARI:  I encourage you to write the version that you can't publish first. There's something valuable in getting it out of your head and out of your body. Something happens when it's a secret in your body, you don't have any perspective on it. And you can't until you get it out of your body and onto the page where you can see it. 
 
Then once it’s out of your body, take a break from it. Give yourself a couple of weeks, then come back to it. Let yourself have the experience of having it out of your body. There's something that happens in that early draft, some kind of neurological thing that permits you to gain perspective, that you can't have when it's just this thing you're not allowed to tell.



Buy the book

To learn more about Sari Botton visit her site.

See all interviews

 

Oldster Magazine explores what it means to travel through time in a human body—of any gender, at every phase of life. It focuses on the good, the bad, and the ugly we experience with each milestone, starting early in life. It’s about the experience of getting older, and what that means at different junctures.


Adventures in Journalism features the highlights and lowlights* (*mostly lowlights) from one Gen X lady writer's rather circuitous career path.

Looking for a quick route toward success as a writer? Allow Sari Botton to demonstrate what not to do, over the course of 30-plus hilarity-(in hindsight)-filled years.


Each week, the editors of certain literary publications select their very favorite new personal essay or memoir piece, and you can find them all collected in the Memoir Monday newsletter—along with details about upcoming readings.

Inside features: First Person Singular features original published essays, and The Lit Lab offers perspectives on craft, publishing, publicity, and more.

 

A Conversation with Madhushree Ghosh

This month I had the good fortune to dialogue with author Madhushree Ghosh, whose debut food narrative memoir, Khabaar: An Immigrant Journey, is written using a braided structure, weaving the stories of her refugee Bengali parents, her own immigration from India to America, and South Asian chefs. We discussed diversity in publishing, dispelled some writing myths, and defined what it means to be a good literary citizen. Scroll down to read the full interview!


Madhushree Ghosh’s work is focused on food, immigrant journeys, social justice in particular, about women-of-color-in-science. Her work has been Pushcart-nominated and was the 2020 Notable Mention in Best American Essays in Food Writing.

She has a PhD in Biochemistry, and post-doctoral fellowship in molecular biology from Johns Hopkins University. She actively mentors emerging women leaders in science and works in global oncology diagnostics, based in San Diego.

Her debut food narrative memoir, Khabaar: An Immigrant Journey (University of Iowa Press, April 2022) weaves the stories of her refugee Bengali parents, her own move from India to America, and innovative South Asian chefs, and how they used food to recreate their worlds in a new place and maintain connections with their families and cultures.

KARIN GUTMAN: What is a braided essay or braided narrative, and how do you suggest a writer begin exploring this kind of structure?

MADHUSHREE GHOSH: I gave a recent talk at Muse and the Marketplace for Grub Street on this and here is a brief overview:

 
 

When you use fragmented threads—each with a narrative arc, a question, a reflection and a resolution or a hint of a resolution—tied to a central question or topic, it’s a braided essay. The resolution doesn’t have to be complete, but the need to align the separate threads needs to be.

A writer should first determine if there are commonalities in the threads, braid it to make the heft in each thread similar, and then ensure the narrative arc is prominent in both. One could be a personal thread and the other political or journalistic or analytical or a combination of all.

KARIN: What qualifies as a “diverse voice”? How has the shift in publishing towards diverse voices impacted you?

MADHUSHREE: The Lee and Low Diversity Survey tells me that there hasn’t been a big enough shift in publishing toward diverse voices. Yet.

Diversity as defined by all DE&IB entities (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging) is a combination of race, gender, orientation, disability, as well as thought.

Here is their data—pictures speak louder:

 
 

Publishing has NOT shifted to diverse voices—this data is from 2019. So no, a brown woman like me has not benefitted from this so-called shift because that shift hasn’t happened. I published my first book, a food narrative memoir-in-essays that took twenty years to get there. That is not a shift but a typical highlight of what we go through.

Whether it’s race, gender, orientation or disability, we are not there. It is time we acknowledge that instead of performative announcements that highlight that issue. The movement toward universality and diversity—of the four pillars (DE&IB) as well as that of diverse opinions and thoughts—is not acknowledged.

KARIN:  What is literary citizenship? Why is it important and what makes you, Madhushree, a good literary citizen?

MADHUSHREE:  If one is a writer, you are a writer for life. How would you acknowledge that and not make it transactional? In order to do so, one needs to read other voices. One needs to keep learning. One needs to passionately champion other writers. Even when one’s work gets rejected on a daily basis. Persistence and Passionate Championship of others should be everyone’s motto.

I’ve been doing this for decades—in life, in my corporate world and in writing. So it’s second nature to me. Sometimes you write reviews. Or interview authors (for me, it’s authors of color, debut authors especially who do not get the publicity they deserve). I talk about other people’s work on my social media platforms. I learn from them. I buy their books and I talk about the style, nature and work. I celebrate their successes. And I believe in their words—that’s just how a writer's life should be or try to be. There are many like me. I hope everyone does what I do because writing should be joyous. The life of a writer is mainly that of rejection. So celebrate yourself, others, and the journey. That’s what a literary citizen should be doing forever.


KARIN:  Tell us about how many of your essays have been plucked from the infamous Slush Pile. Are there any other writing myths you wish to dispel?

MADHUSHREE:  Quite a few of them actually. A slush pile is the general mailbox or in the olden-golden days, the massive paper submissions a young (likely unpaid) intern sifted through in literary journal offices.

My work for example, the one essay that led to KHABAAR, Maacher Bazaar: Fish for Life, was picked up by Sari Botton, the then editor during the Christmas break. I was told by others not to submit during holidays and here was Sari working through one. So that’s myth one. The essay was a Notable Mention for Best American Essays in Food Writing, led to University of Iowa Press accepting my food narrative memoir, and my book being published in April 2022.

The myths are many. That submitting into a slush pile means you are lost. I’ve published in The Washington Post, Catapult, DAME, LA Times, New York Times, The Rumpus, Hippocampus and then made great connections with the editors and most of them ask me to submit to them directly. Donna Talarico of Hippocampus recently invited me to speak at their writing conference HippoCamp which is a full circle for me –so that’s another myth, that once you’re published, you move on. No, you don’t. You respect them for taking a chance on your work and you continue to build the relationship.

KARIN:  How do you balance your career as a scientist and your life as a writer?

MADHUSHREE:  I don’t. I work almost 12 hours on my day job which is global—and needs my attention at all times of the day (and night). I write in between. Sometimes 5-7 AM before the day starts. Sometimes 8-11 PM after everyone is asleep. Most times (pre-pandemic) on all long flights. I write on my phone (as notes) and transcribe. On email threads (to myself). Any which way to get the work done.

Don’t get me wrong, I love my day job. So it’s not like it’s a hindrance. This is life. No one said life was going to be easy. All you have to do is make it joyous and intentional in how you spend the time.

Buy the book

To learn more about Madhushree Ghosh visit her
site.

See all interviews